I have a few comments with respect to the points made in this article which appeared today.
1. We are prisoners of the two-party system that the FPTP generates. We don't have a two-party system here but most elections have been dominated by two alliances each made up of two or more parties. Our political system has been quite dynamic if we look at the weights of the different parties on the political chessboard over time and in the different alliances at voting time. It has also been renewing itself. Maybe not at the speed we would have wished though.
In fact the problems we're having have more to do with a serious degrading of policy-making than with some imagined flaws of the FPTP. The latter is an excellent system that needs a little tweaking. We definitely don't want what happened in Rodrigues with its PR system. At any rate. More on this soon.
2. We've seen many reports on electoral reform throughout the years. A handful at most as far as I can remember. Besides we haven't seen a lot of good ideas. That come close to the quality of our FPTP system.
1. We are prisoners of the two-party system that the FPTP generates. We don't have a two-party system here but most elections have been dominated by two alliances each made up of two or more parties. Our political system has been quite dynamic if we look at the weights of the different parties on the political chessboard over time and in the different alliances at voting time. It has also been renewing itself. Maybe not at the speed we would have wished though.
In fact the problems we're having have more to do with a serious degrading of policy-making than with some imagined flaws of the FPTP. The latter is an excellent system that needs a little tweaking. We definitely don't want what happened in Rodrigues with its PR system. At any rate. More on this soon.
2. We've seen many reports on electoral reform throughout the years. A handful at most as far as I can remember. Besides we haven't seen a lot of good ideas. That come close to the quality of our FPTP system.